Rapes of Sussex
The Rapes of Sussex are the major divisions of that county, broadly equivalent to the hundreds and wapentakes into which other counties are divided, although each rape is itself divided into hundreds. Sussex is unique in using this designation of its divisions. Neighbouring Kent has divisions known as lathes, likewise unique to their county.
The origin of the rapes is unknown, but they appear to predate the Norman Conquest.[1] Sussex was once a separate Saxon kingdom with its own institutions, but whether the rapes go back that far cannot be known.
There are various theories about the origin of the rapes of Sussex. The most ambitious suggestion has them as survivals from the Romano-British era,[2] or they might represent the shires of the Kingdom of Sussex.[3] The rapes may be later though, deriving from the system of fortifications devised by Alfred the Great in the late ninth century to defeat the Vikings.[4] The latest date suggested has them as creations of William the Conqueror, which is certainly possible.
The Sussex rapes each had a headquarters in the developed south where the lord's hall, court, demesne lands, principal church and peasant holdings were located,[2] whereas to the north there were smaller dependent settlements in the marsh, woodland and heath.[2] Each rape is split into several hundreds.
Name
One suggested origin of the word, suggested by Edward Lye in the 18th century, is suggested by the Icelandic territorial division known in Old Norse as hreppr, meaning 'district or tract of land'. An actual origin in the Norse word is rejected in the New English Dictionary, and according to the English Place-Name Society 'phonologically impossible'.[5]
The suggestion made by William Somner in the 17th century[5] has the derivation of the word from the Old English rap meaning 'rope'.[5] The suggestion that ropes were used to mark out territory,[6] was well countered by J H Round]], asking "do those who advance such views realize the size of the districts they have to deal with?"[7] However, Heinrich Brunner explained the application of 'rope' to an administrative district by the old German custom of defining the limits of the 'peace' of popular open-air courts by stakes and ropes,[5] the ropes then giving a name first to the court and then afterwards to the area of its jurisdiction, and produced a case where reep, the Dutch cognate of rap, is applied to such a judicial area.[5] A rope may bound also the precincts of a court for the rape, but any such explanation can be mere speculation.
If these territories are not of Anglo-Saxon origin but were introduced by the Normans, then it has been suggested that the term may come from the old French raper, meaning to seize or take by force,[8] which gives us also the other meaning of the word in English.
History
Origins
The origin of the Rapes is not known.[9] It is possible that the rapes represent the shires of the ancient kingdom of Sussex, especially as in the 12th century they had sheriffs of their own.[3] According to John Morris, the boundary between the Rapes of Lewes and Pevensey, since it cuts through the middle of Lewes, probably pre-dates the founding of Lewes in the late 9th or early 10th century. If one boundary had existed so early then it is quite possible that other boundaries also existed.[9] Sussex's rapes may have been a similar division to the six or seven Lathes of neighbouring Kent, which were undoubtedly early administrative units.[5]
Another possibility is that the rapes may derive from the system of fortifications, or burhs (boroughs) devised by Alfred the Great in the late ninth century to defeat the Vikings. The Rapes, or similar predecessors may have been created for the purpose of maintaining these early boroughs, or they may have re-used earlier divisions for this purpose.[9] In Sussex, the fortifications in the Burghal Hidage were recorded as being at Eorpeburnan on the Sussex-Kent border, Hastings, Lewes, Burpham and Chichester. The 'Burghal Hidage' lists boroughs in geographical order.[9] Burpham was the predecessor of Arundel and Eorpeburnan or Heorpeburnan should be the predecessor of Rye.[9] Pevensey and Steyning were not included. It looks as if the lands of Steyning served Lewes and those of Pevensey served Hastings, while the eastern portion of the later Hastings rape was attached to the Rye area.[9] It is possible that these divisions might be rapes as four of them (taking Burpham as equivalent to neighbouring Arundel) had the same centres as later rapes.[5] If this is the case then the rapes must have been completely reorganised in the next century and a half. Since the system of fortifications introduced by Alfred the Great extended into Surrey and Wessex as well, but neither of these regions have rapes or any similar divisions.[5]
It is also possible that the 'Rape of Arundel' that is twice mentioned in the Domesday Book was the later rape of Arundel and not the whole 'rape of Earl Roger (of Montgomery)', which included the later rape of Chichester.[5] The existence of the rapes before the Norman Conquest provides the most natural explanation of the fact that the two later rapes of Chichester and Arundel are represented in the Domesday Book of the single 'rape of Earl Roger', William the Conqueror's most important grantee in Sussex.[5] William might of course have created five rapes only, one of which, out of all proportion to the others in size, was afterwards divided, but for this there is no evidence.[5]
Norman castleries
Although the origin and original purpose of the Rapes is not known, their function after 1066 is clear. With its own lord and sheriff, each Rape was an administrative and fiscal unit.[9] The organisation of the whole of Sussex apart from royal and church lands into territorial blocks each with a fortress near the sea was exceptional.[9] Situated between Normandy and London, control over Sussex was strategically important to William the Conqueror, who needed to protect his major communication routes.
At the time of the Norman Conquest, four rapes are recorded: Arundel, Lewes, Pevensey and Hastings. The Rape of Arundel consisted of the entire area of Sussex west of the River Adur, corresponding to the boundaries of both the western division of the church in Sussex (the origin of the Archdeaconry of Chichester)[10][11] and the boundaries of the traditional western area of the Sussex dialect.[10] By the time of the Domesday Book, William the Conqueror had created the Rape of Bramber out of parts of the Arundel and Lewes rapes, so that the Adur estuary could be better defended.[11][2][12]
In the Domesday survey, five great Norman lords held the rapes into which Sussex was divided, four of them giving their names to four of the five divisions as they were called in Domesday Book; at the accession of Henry I of England in 1100[13]they were Robert of Bellême in Arundel rape,[14] Robert's nephew William, Count of Mortain in Pevensey,[15] William of Warenne in Lewes,[16] the count of Eu in Hastings and, the only fully trustworthy Sussex lord at the time, Philip de Braose.
Under the Normans each rape was now centred on a castle: Sir Henry Ellis's observation that the rapes "were military districts for the supply of the castles which existed in each" applied to the Anglo-Norman period[17] Each rape had a single sheriff and ran as a strip, north-south, from the border with Surrey or Kent to the English Channel. The castles of Arundel, Bramber and Lewes were sited on positions overlooking the rivers Arun, Adur and Ouse respectively, while those at Chichester, Hastings and Pevensey overlooked the coast.
Between 1250 and 1262, the rape of Chichester was created from the western half of Arundel rape.[11] From this time onwards, Sussex was divided into—from west to east—Chichester, Arundel, Bramber, Lewes, Pevensey and Hastings rapes.
Modern period
The rapal courts continued to meet and stewards for the Rapes were recorded into the 18th century. In the 17th century an annual muster took place at the same place in each Rape, such as at Ditchling Common for the Lewes Rape and Berwick Common for the Rape of Pevensey. The muster could take place more frequently at times of perceived danger. Each Rape also had a horse company which would meet at Bury Hill for the Rapes of Arundel, Bramber and Chichester, and at Piltdown for the Rapes of Hastings, Lewes and Pevensey.[18]
By 1894 most administrative functions of the Rapes had ended. The Rapes of Arundel, Bramber and Chichester each responsible for the repair of bridges and the Rape of Hastings had a separate coroner, which lasted until 1960.[19][20]
The Sussex rapes
| Name | Castle | Hundreds | Towns and cities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rape of Chichester | Chichester Castle | Aldwick, Bosham, Box and Stockbridge, Dumpford, Easebourne, Manhood, Westbourne and Singleton | Bognor Regis, Chichester, Midhurst, Selsey |
| Rape of Arundel | Arundel Castle | Avisford, Bury, Poling, Rotherbridge, West Easwrith | Arundel, Littlehampton |
| Rape of Bramber | Bramber Castle | Brightford, Burbeach, East Easwrith, Fishersgate, Patching, Singlecross, Steyning, Tarring, Tipnoak, West Grinstead, Windham and Ewhurst | Crawley, Horsham, Shoreham-by-Sea, Worthing |
| Rape of Lewes | Lewes Castle | Barcombe, Buttinghill, Dean, Fishersgate, Holmstrow, Poynings, Preston, Street, Swanborough, Whalebone, Younsmere | Brighton, Hove, Haywards Heath, Lewes |
| Rape of Pevensey | Pevensey Castle | Alciston, Bishopstone, Burleigh Arches, Danehill Horsted, Dill, East Grinstead, Eastbourne, Flexborough, Hartfield, Longbridge, Loxfield Dorset, Loxfield Pelham, Pevensey Lowey, Ringmer, Rotherfield, Rushmonden, Shiplake, Totnore, Willingdon | East Grinstead, Eastbourne, Uckfield |
| Rape of Hastings | Hastings Castle | Baldstrow, Battle, Bexhill, Foxearle, Goldspur, Gostrow, Guestling, Hawkesborough, Henhurst, Netherfield, Ninfield, Shoyswell, Staple | Battle, Hastings, Rye |
Rapal castles
.jpg)
Hundreds
Each Rape is subdivided into several hundreds and half-hundreds. The half-hundreds arose when the Rape of Bramber was created in the late 11th century where the new Rapal boundary divided a pre-existing hundred in two. This happened at East and West Easwrith, which was divided between the Rapes of Arundel and Bramber, and Fishersgate, which was divided between the Rapes of Bramber and Lewes. By the 19th century the Rapes were each subdivided for administrative purposes into two divisions. Each Rape had an upper division covering the northern, Wealden half of each Rape, and a lower division covering the southern, coastal half of each Rape.
Symbolism
The six martlets on the Sussex flag and emblem are said to represent the six Rapes, a design which goes back to at least the 17th century.
See also
References
- ↑ The origin was still reported as "contested" as late as 1942 (Helen Maud Cam (preface dated 1942), Liberties & communities in mediæval England: Collected Studies in Local Administration and Topography, 1944:193).
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Brandon, Peter (2006). Sussex. Phillimore. ISBN 9780709069980.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 "The Encyclopedia Britannica 11th edition, 1911, Online Version". http://www.archive.org/stream/encyclopaediabri22chisrich#page/900/mode/2up. Retrieved 13 March 2012.
- ↑ Domesdaybook.net: Rape
- ↑ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 Mawer, Allen, F. M. Stenton with J. E. B. Gover (1930) [1929]. Sussex - Part I and Part II. English Place-Name Society.
- ↑ F.E. Sawyer "The rapes and their origin", Archaeological Review 1 (1888), p. 54-59.
- ↑ Round, letter in Archaeological Review 1 (1888), p. 229.
- ↑ "Origin of the Sussex 'Rapes'". Sussex Castles. http://www.sussexcastles.com/sussex-timeline/1067-origin-of-the-sussex.html. Retrieved 2015.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 Thorn, Caroline; Thorn, Frank (June 2007). "Sussex". University of Hull. https://hydra.hull.ac.uk/assets/hull:522/content. Retrieved 30 August 2015.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Hare, Chris (1995). A History of the Sussex People. Worthing: Southern Heritage Books. ISBN 978-0952709701.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 The rape of Chichester (A History of the County of Sussex - Volume : {{{2}}} (Victoria County History))
- ↑ The rape and honour of Lewes (A History of the County of Sussex - Volume : {{{2}}} (Victoria County History))
- ↑ Henry's dealings with the lords of the rapes is discussed in Judith A. Green, The Government of England Under Henry I 1989:115.
- ↑ Confiscated by Henry in 1102 and held by the Crown through his reign (Green 1989)
- ↑ Pevensey was confiscated by Henry in 1102 and regranted to Gilbert de l'Aigle (Green 1989).
- ↑ William transferred his allegiance to Henry and remained a stalwart supporter (Green 1989) as Earl of Surrey.
- ↑ Ellis,quoted in Norman John Greville Pounds, The medieval castle in England and Wales: a social and political history 1993:17.
- ↑ Grehan & Mace 2012, p. 176
- ↑ Somerville 1894, p. 762
- ↑ "Coronership of the Rye District of East Sussex and predecessor jurisdictions". The National Archives. http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/rd/2bb0fbae-5767-4dcf-96e3-fe2c16b1cfc6. Retrieved 29 September 2015.